www.travelled.ru

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-slt-a99/3



http://sonyalphanex.blogspot.com/2013/1 ... y-a7r.html










http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta77/2

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-a7r/2

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Sony_Alpha_A7_II/

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-7-ii/3





http://cameradecision.com/compare/Sony- ... SLT-A77-II

http://www.imaging-resource.com/cameras ... ony/a7-ii/
http://www.ronmartblog.com/2014/03/comp ... shawn.html

https://www.flickr.com/groups/2076312@N ... 260363133/

If you do not find the a77 limiting your photography I'd suggest you invest in some nice glass instead.

I have both and I agree with with Simon's view. The AF on the A99 is faster and more accurate for action shots than the A77. The AF-D works well and my success rate for BIF is much better.

I find myself reaching for my A99 more often than not. The details, dynamic range is really great. High ISO is so much better.

But yes I use good glass and that makes the difference as well. Given the choice I would opt for glass over body.